Shared Responsibility

PVS/KIS integration: clarify product and operational responsibility before the pilot

A demo does not decide who owns lifecycle, updates, incidents, external dependencies or acceptance evidence. MEMM therefore starts a concrete integration with a bounded responsibility model between PVS/KIS/OEM, the named MEMM release scope and external infrastructure or governance owners.

Topics:PVSKISOEMShared ResponsibilityPilot

Three zones that should not be silently merged

  • PVS/KIS/OEM: healthcare application, business purpose, user experience and organization-specific workflow.
  • MEMM scope: agreed product, runtime, API and release boundaries.
  • External operators/governance: infrastructure, providers, identity/trust services and externally assigned responsibilities.

Why the discussion belongs before the demo

A bounded scope exposes assumptions about deployment, updates, failure handling, external dependencies and later acceptance evidence before they become hidden project risk.

What this page explicitly does not claim: This is not a universal RACI. Actual responsibility depends on contract, deployment, regulatory role, target environment and release and must be agreed per project.