PTV · ATV · Draft

How do gematik PTVs, ATVs and drafts map to MEMM product boundaries?

The website connects product and provider types to fixed document versions and selected AFO, section and interface references. Specification & Trust explains which requirement governs each architecture boundary. The mapping interprets the sources and does not claim complete implementation verification.

Topics:PTVATVDraftApprovalTI-MTI-Flow
The key relationship

From role to a reviewable statement

  1. PTV / ATV

    Identify product type and provider role separately

    pins
  2. Source + version + requirement

    Check the applicable selection and draft status

    bounds the statement
  3. Named assessment scope

    Statement, responsible role and evidence reference

Reading path through the document matrix. A source mapping is not implementation evidence or approval.

Different documents, different obligations

  • PTV: normative product/manufacturer scope; product type version differs from the document version.
  • ATV: normative provider/operator scope; listing an ATV does not establish ITL as that provider.
  • Draft: prerelease planning reference, subject to change or withdrawal.

Evidence discipline

Public architecture explanations name document version, role, requirement or section, and meaning together. Implementation evidence additionally needs a test procedure, reproducible result and reviewer decision. The website explains selected requirements; its mapping is not a complete test catalogue.

Versioned primary sources

What this page explicitly does not claim: The source review of 17 October 2026 uses supplied primary PDFs, versioned FHIR packages and pinned JSON/OpenAPI schemas. The editorial explanation is not approval, certification or a claim of complete implementation.